Ayoa vs OmniFocus 4: Comprehensive Comparison
2
Ayoa vs OmniFocus 4: Visual Collaboration vs GTD Mastery
Ayoa combines AI-powered mind mapping with task management for visual thinkers, while OmniFocus 4 delivers professional GTD implementation exclusively for Apple users. Both target productivity but serve different workflow styles.
Ayoa | OmniFocus 4 | |
|---|---|---|
Best For | Visual thinkers, creative teams | GTD practitioners, Apple users |
Starting Price | Free plan available | $74.99 one-time |
Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Apple ecosystem only |
What is Ayoa?
AI-powered mind mapping with organic and radial layouts
Task boards featuring Kanban, Gantt, and urgency views
Real-time collaboration with whiteboards and team chat
Visual workflow tools for creative project management
What is OmniFocus 4?
Professional GTD implementation with project hierarchies
Custom perspectives with powerful filtering and tagging
Deep Apple ecosystem integration and automation
Advanced task organization with contexts and energy levels
Feature Comparison
Feature | Ayoa | OmniFocus 4 |
|---|---|---|
Mind Mapping | Yes | No |
GTD Methodology | Limited | Yes |
Team Collaboration | Yes | No |
Custom Perspectives | Limited | Yes |
AI Features | Yes | No |
Cross-Platform | Yes | No |
Automation | Limited | Yes |
Gantt Charts | Yes | No |
Pricing
Ayoa
Free plan available
Paid plans from $10/month
Good for trying visual workflows
OmniFocus 4
$74.99 one-time purchase
Or $9.99/month subscription
Professional pricing, no free tier
Key Considerations
Ayoa
Learning curve for complex visual workflows
Performance issues with large mind maps
Premium pricing adds up for teams
OmniFocus 4
Apple ecosystem lock-in requirement
Complex setup demands time investment
No collaboration features for teams
Verdict
Choose Ayoa if you're a visual thinker who needs mind mapping and team collaboration across different platforms. Pick OmniFocus 4 if you're committed to GTD methodology and live entirely within Apple's ecosystem.
Both excel in their respective niches but serve fundamentally different productivity philosophies and user types.




